The
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (
Trai) has shot off a letter to
MTNL seeking asking why it has violated licence conditions under which a basic service operator (
BSO) cannot offer value-added services such as
IPTV. The regulator pointed out that
MTNL has reported
IPTV tariffs and providing
IPTV as a value-added service under the
BSO licence.
MTNL has the choice of applying for an expensive
UASL The regulator can also impose a fine on the state-owned
telecom company. At the moment,
MTNL has licences to operate basic as well as cellular services.
MTNL plans to protest the regulator's ruling.
MTNL, was the first to introduce
IPTV services last October and will soon be facing
IPTV competition from Reliance Communications and
Bharti in the
IPTV segment as these operators are also readying their plans.
MTNL is targeting around 50,000 subscribers this year and has already has 6,000.
MTNL charges Rs 250 ($US6.35) a month for around 102 channels and an upfront payment of Rs 3,000 ($US75) as rental for the set-top box for providing
IPTV services.
There has been a lot of press about IPTV regulation in India that has been quite positive until now. The bump in the road that MTNL has hit shows how difficult it is to forecast markets like India.I would appreciate comments from any readers who are closer to this situation.